Code Review Graph + Docs + Config

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-10 15:15:19 +02:00
parent 603c2b332c
commit ee063aa460
26 changed files with 10420 additions and 3 deletions
+37
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
{
"permissions": {
"allow": [
"Bash",
"Write",
"WebFetch",
"WebSearch",
"Edit"
]
},
"hooks": {
"PostToolUse": [
{
"matcher": "Edit|Write|Bash",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "code-review-graph update --skip-flows",
"timeout": 30
}
]
}
],
"SessionStart": [
{
"matcher": "",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "code-review-graph status",
"timeout": 10
}
]
}
]
}
}
+27
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
---
name: Debug Issue
description: Systematically debug issues using graph-powered code navigation
---
## Debug Issue
Use the knowledge graph to systematically trace and debug issues.
### Steps
1. Use `semantic_search_nodes` to find code related to the issue.
2. Use `query_graph` with `callers_of` and `callees_of` to trace call chains.
3. Use `get_flow` to see full execution paths through suspected areas.
4. Run `detect_changes` to check if recent changes caused the issue.
5. Use `get_impact_radius` on suspected files to see what else is affected.
### Tips
- Check both callers and callees to understand the full context.
- Look at affected flows to find the entry point that triggers the bug.
- Recent changes are the most common source of new issues.
## Token Efficiency Rules
- ALWAYS start with `get_minimal_context(task="<your task>")` before any other graph tool.
- Use `detail_level="minimal"` on all calls. Only escalate to "standard" when minimal is insufficient.
- Target: complete any review/debug/refactor task in ≤5 tool calls and ≤800 total output tokens.
+28
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
---
name: Explore Codebase
description: Navigate and understand codebase structure using the knowledge graph
---
## Explore Codebase
Use the code-review-graph MCP tools to explore and understand the codebase.
### Steps
1. Run `list_graph_stats` to see overall codebase metrics.
2. Run `get_architecture_overview` for high-level community structure.
3. Use `list_communities` to find major modules, then `get_community` for details.
4. Use `semantic_search_nodes` to find specific functions or classes.
5. Use `query_graph` with patterns like `callers_of`, `callees_of`, `imports_of` to trace relationships.
6. Use `list_flows` and `get_flow` to understand execution paths.
### Tips
- Start broad (stats, architecture) then narrow down to specific areas.
- Use `children_of` on a file to see all its functions and classes.
- Use `find_large_functions` to identify complex code.
## Token Efficiency Rules
- ALWAYS start with `get_minimal_context(task="<your task>")` before any other graph tool.
- Use `detail_level="minimal"` on all calls. Only escalate to "standard" when minimal is insufficient.
- Target: complete any review/debug/refactor task in ≤5 tool calls and ≤800 total output tokens.
+28
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
---
name: Refactor Safely
description: Plan and execute safe refactoring using dependency analysis
---
## Refactor Safely
Use the knowledge graph to plan and execute refactoring with confidence.
### Steps
1. Use `refactor_tool` with mode="suggest" for community-driven refactoring suggestions.
2. Use `refactor_tool` with mode="dead_code" to find unreferenced code.
3. For renames, use `refactor_tool` with mode="rename" to preview all affected locations.
4. Use `apply_refactor_tool` with the refactor_id to apply renames.
5. After changes, run `detect_changes` to verify the refactoring impact.
### Safety Checks
- Always preview before applying (rename mode gives you an edit list).
- Check `get_impact_radius` before major refactors.
- Use `get_affected_flows` to ensure no critical paths are broken.
- Run `find_large_functions` to identify decomposition targets.
## Token Efficiency Rules
- ALWAYS start with `get_minimal_context(task="<your task>")` before any other graph tool.
- Use `detail_level="minimal"` on all calls. Only escalate to "standard" when minimal is insufficient.
- Target: complete any review/debug/refactor task in ≤5 tool calls and ≤800 total output tokens.
+29
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
---
name: Review Changes
description: Perform a structured code review using change detection and impact
---
## Review Changes
Perform a thorough, risk-aware code review using the knowledge graph.
### Steps
1. Run `detect_changes` to get risk-scored change analysis.
2. Run `get_affected_flows` to find impacted execution paths.
3. For each high-risk function, run `query_graph` with pattern="tests_for" to check test coverage.
4. Run `get_impact_radius` to understand the blast radius.
5. For any untested changes, suggest specific test cases.
### Output Format
Provide findings grouped by risk level (high/medium/low) with:
- What changed and why it matters
- Test coverage status
- Suggested improvements
- Overall merge recommendation
## Token Efficiency Rules
- ALWAYS start with `get_minimal_context(task="<your task>")` before any other graph tool.
- Use `detail_level="minimal"` on all calls. Only escalate to "standard" when minimal is insufficient.
- Target: complete any review/debug/refactor task in ≤5 tool calls and ≤800 total output tokens.
+38
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
<!-- code-review-graph MCP tools -->
## MCP Tools: code-review-graph
**IMPORTANT: This project has a knowledge graph. ALWAYS use the
code-review-graph MCP tools BEFORE using Grep/Glob/Read to explore
the codebase.** The graph is faster, cheaper (fewer tokens), and gives
you structural context (callers, dependents, test coverage) that file
scanning cannot.
### When to use graph tools FIRST
- **Exploring code**: `semantic_search_nodes` or `query_graph` instead of Grep
- **Understanding impact**: `get_impact_radius` instead of manually tracing imports
- **Code review**: `detect_changes` + `get_review_context` instead of reading entire files
- **Finding relationships**: `query_graph` with callers_of/callees_of/imports_of/tests_for
- **Architecture questions**: `get_architecture_overview` + `list_communities`
Fall back to Grep/Glob/Read **only** when the graph doesn't cover what you need.
### Key Tools
| Tool | Use when |
|------|----------|
| `detect_changes` | Reviewing code changes — gives risk-scored analysis |
| `get_review_context` | Need source snippets for review — token-efficient |
| `get_impact_radius` | Understanding blast radius of a change |
| `get_affected_flows` | Finding which execution paths are impacted |
| `query_graph` | Tracing callers, callees, imports, tests, dependencies |
| `semantic_search_nodes` | Finding functions/classes by name or keyword |
| `get_architecture_overview` | Understanding high-level codebase structure |
| `refactor_tool` | Planning renames, finding dead code |
### Workflow
1. The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
2. Use `detect_changes` for code review.
3. Use `get_affected_flows` to understand impact.
4. Use `query_graph` pattern="tests_for" to check coverage.
+2
View File
@@ -4,3 +4,5 @@ node_modules/
*.log
storage/
worker/worker.pid
# Added by code-review-graph
.code-review-graph/
+10
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
# Default ignored files
/shelf/
/workspace.xml
# Editor-based HTTP Client requests
/httpRequests/
# Ignored default folder with query files
/queries/
# Datasource local storage ignored files
/dataSources/
/dataSources.local.xml
+8
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<module type="WEB_MODULE" version="4">
<component name="NewModuleRootManager">
<content url="file://$MODULE_DIR$" />
<orderEntry type="inheritedJdk" />
<orderEntry type="sourceFolder" forTests="false" />
</component>
</module>
+8
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project version="4">
<component name="ProjectModuleManager">
<modules>
<module fileurl="file://$PROJECT_DIR$/.idea/Ombrora-YTDLP.iml" filepath="$PROJECT_DIR$/.idea/Ombrora-YTDLP.iml" />
</modules>
</component>
</project>
Generated
+19
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project version="4">
<component name="MessDetectorOptionsConfiguration">
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
</component>
<component name="PHPCSFixerOptionsConfiguration">
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
</component>
<component name="PHPCodeSnifferOptionsConfiguration">
<option name="highlightLevel" value="WARNING" />
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
</component>
<component name="PhpStanOptionsConfiguration">
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
</component>
<component name="PsalmOptionsConfiguration">
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
</component>
</project>
Generated
+6
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project version="4">
<component name="VcsDirectoryMappings">
<mapping directory="$PROJECT_DIR$" vcs="Git" />
</component>
</project>
+38
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
<!-- code-review-graph MCP tools -->
## MCP Tools: code-review-graph
**IMPORTANT: This project has a knowledge graph. ALWAYS use the
code-review-graph MCP tools BEFORE using Grep/Glob/Read to explore
the codebase.** The graph is faster, cheaper (fewer tokens), and gives
you structural context (callers, dependents, test coverage) that file
scanning cannot.
### When to use graph tools FIRST
- **Exploring code**: `semantic_search_nodes` or `query_graph` instead of Grep
- **Understanding impact**: `get_impact_radius` instead of manually tracing imports
- **Code review**: `detect_changes` + `get_review_context` instead of reading entire files
- **Finding relationships**: `query_graph` with callers_of/callees_of/imports_of/tests_for
- **Architecture questions**: `get_architecture_overview` + `list_communities`
Fall back to Grep/Glob/Read **only** when the graph doesn't cover what you need.
### Key Tools
| Tool | Use when |
|------|----------|
| `detect_changes` | Reviewing code changes — gives risk-scored analysis |
| `get_review_context` | Need source snippets for review — token-efficient |
| `get_impact_radius` | Understanding blast radius of a change |
| `get_affected_flows` | Finding which execution paths are impacted |
| `query_graph` | Tracing callers, callees, imports, tests, dependencies |
| `semantic_search_nodes` | Finding functions/classes by name or keyword |
| `get_architecture_overview` | Understanding high-level codebase structure |
| `refactor_tool` | Planning renames, finding dead code |
### Workflow
1. The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
2. Use `detect_changes` for code review.
3. Use `get_affected_flows` to understand impact.
4. Use `query_graph` pattern="tests_for" to check coverage.
+11
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
{
"mcpServers": {
"code-review-graph": {
"command": "code-review-graph",
"args": [
"serve"
],
"type": "stdio"
}
}
}
+12
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
{
"mcpServers": {
"code-review-graph": {
"command": "code-review-graph",
"args": [
"serve"
],
"type": "stdio",
"env": []
}
}
}
+38
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
<!-- code-review-graph MCP tools -->
## MCP Tools: code-review-graph
**IMPORTANT: This project has a knowledge graph. ALWAYS use the
code-review-graph MCP tools BEFORE using Grep/Glob/Read to explore
the codebase.** The graph is faster, cheaper (fewer tokens), and gives
you structural context (callers, dependents, test coverage) that file
scanning cannot.
### When to use graph tools FIRST
- **Exploring code**: `semantic_search_nodes` or `query_graph` instead of Grep
- **Understanding impact**: `get_impact_radius` instead of manually tracing imports
- **Code review**: `detect_changes` + `get_review_context` instead of reading entire files
- **Finding relationships**: `query_graph` with callers_of/callees_of/imports_of/tests_for
- **Architecture questions**: `get_architecture_overview` + `list_communities`
Fall back to Grep/Glob/Read **only** when the graph doesn't cover what you need.
### Key Tools
| Tool | Use when |
|------|----------|
| `detect_changes` | Reviewing code changes — gives risk-scored analysis |
| `get_review_context` | Need source snippets for review — token-efficient |
| `get_impact_radius` | Understanding blast radius of a change |
| `get_affected_flows` | Finding which execution paths are impacted |
| `query_graph` | Tracing callers, callees, imports, tests, dependencies |
| `semantic_search_nodes` | Finding functions/classes by name or keyword |
| `get_architecture_overview` | Understanding high-level codebase structure |
| `refactor_tool` | Planning renames, finding dead code |
### Workflow
1. The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
2. Use `detect_changes` for code review.
3. Use `get_affected_flows` to understand impact.
4. Use `query_graph` pattern="tests_for" to check coverage.
+38
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
<!-- code-review-graph MCP tools -->
## MCP Tools: code-review-graph
**IMPORTANT: This project has a knowledge graph. ALWAYS use the
code-review-graph MCP tools BEFORE using Grep/Glob/Read to explore
the codebase.** The graph is faster, cheaper (fewer tokens), and gives
you structural context (callers, dependents, test coverage) that file
scanning cannot.
### When to use graph tools FIRST
- **Exploring code**: `semantic_search_nodes` or `query_graph` instead of Grep
- **Understanding impact**: `get_impact_radius` instead of manually tracing imports
- **Code review**: `detect_changes` + `get_review_context` instead of reading entire files
- **Finding relationships**: `query_graph` with callers_of/callees_of/imports_of/tests_for
- **Architecture questions**: `get_architecture_overview` + `list_communities`
Fall back to Grep/Glob/Read **only** when the graph doesn't cover what you need.
### Key Tools
| Tool | Use when |
|------|----------|
| `detect_changes` | Reviewing code changes — gives risk-scored analysis |
| `get_review_context` | Need source snippets for review — token-efficient |
| `get_impact_radius` | Understanding blast radius of a change |
| `get_affected_flows` | Finding which execution paths are impacted |
| `query_graph` | Tracing callers, callees, imports, tests, dependencies |
| `semantic_search_nodes` | Finding functions/classes by name or keyword |
| `get_architecture_overview` | Understanding high-level codebase structure |
| `refactor_tool` | Planning renames, finding dead code |
### Workflow
1. The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
2. Use `detect_changes` for code review.
3. Use `get_affected_flows` to understand impact.
4. Use `query_graph` pattern="tests_for" to check coverage.
+39
View File
@@ -35,3 +35,42 @@ This version has breaking changes — APIs, conventions, and file structure may
This block is written and re-added by `next dev` — verify at `node_modules/next/dist/server/lib/generate-agent-files.js`. Removing it from a diff only re-creates the uncommitted change; committing it with your work keeps the tree clean.
<!-- END:nextjs-agent-rules -->
<!-- code-review-graph MCP tools -->
## MCP Tools: code-review-graph
**IMPORTANT: This project has a knowledge graph. ALWAYS use the
code-review-graph MCP tools BEFORE using Grep/Glob/Read to explore
the codebase.** The graph is faster, cheaper (fewer tokens), and gives
you structural context (callers, dependents, test coverage) that file
scanning cannot.
### When to use graph tools FIRST
- **Exploring code**: `semantic_search_nodes` or `query_graph` instead of Grep
- **Understanding impact**: `get_impact_radius` instead of manually tracing imports
- **Code review**: `detect_changes` + `get_review_context` instead of reading entire files
- **Finding relationships**: `query_graph` with callers_of/callees_of/imports_of/tests_for
- **Architecture questions**: `get_architecture_overview` + `list_communities`
Fall back to Grep/Glob/Read **only** when the graph doesn't cover what you need.
### Key Tools
| Tool | Use when |
|------|----------|
| `detect_changes` | Reviewing code changes — gives risk-scored analysis |
| `get_review_context` | Need source snippets for review — token-efficient |
| `get_impact_radius` | Understanding blast radius of a change |
| `get_affected_flows` | Finding which execution paths are impacted |
| `query_graph` | Tracing callers, callees, imports, tests, dependencies |
| `semantic_search_nodes` | Finding functions/classes by name or keyword |
| `get_architecture_overview` | Understanding high-level codebase structure |
| `refactor_tool` | Planning renames, finding dead code |
### Workflow
1. The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
2. Use `detect_changes` for code review.
3. Use `get_affected_flows` to understand impact.
4. Use `query_graph` pattern="tests_for" to check coverage.
+38
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
<!-- code-review-graph MCP tools -->
## MCP Tools: code-review-graph
**IMPORTANT: This project has a knowledge graph. ALWAYS use the
code-review-graph MCP tools BEFORE using Grep/Glob/Read to explore
the codebase.** The graph is faster, cheaper (fewer tokens), and gives
you structural context (callers, dependents, test coverage) that file
scanning cannot.
### When to use graph tools FIRST
- **Exploring code**: `semantic_search_nodes` or `query_graph` instead of Grep
- **Understanding impact**: `get_impact_radius` instead of manually tracing imports
- **Code review**: `detect_changes` + `get_review_context` instead of reading entire files
- **Finding relationships**: `query_graph` with callers_of/callees_of/imports_of/tests_for
- **Architecture questions**: `get_architecture_overview` + `list_communities`
Fall back to Grep/Glob/Read **only** when the graph doesn't cover what you need.
### Key Tools
| Tool | Use when |
|------|----------|
| `detect_changes` | Reviewing code changes — gives risk-scored analysis |
| `get_review_context` | Need source snippets for review — token-efficient |
| `get_impact_radius` | Understanding blast radius of a change |
| `get_affected_flows` | Finding which execution paths are impacted |
| `query_graph` | Tracing callers, callees, imports, tests, dependencies |
| `semantic_search_nodes` | Finding functions/classes by name or keyword |
| `get_architecture_overview` | Understanding high-level codebase structure |
| `refactor_tool` | Planning renames, finding dead code |
### Workflow
1. The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
2. Use `detect_changes` for code review.
3. Use `get_affected_flows` to understand impact.
4. Use `query_graph` pattern="tests_for" to check coverage.
File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
# Ombrora-YTDLP — Design Spec
Date: 2026-08-10
## Vue d'ensemble
Interface web publique permettant a n'importe quel utilisateur de soumettre une URL de video a telecharger via yt-dlp. Les telechargements sont traites en arriere-plan par un worker Node.js gere par Passenger sur o2switch. Les fichiers sont stockes localement dans un dossier prive et accessibles via un lien temporaire a duree de vie configurable.
---
## Architecture generale
Approche retenue : **Monorepo Next.js + Worker script Node.js separe**.
- `src/` : app Next.js (UI React + API routes)
- `worker/` : script Node.js long-running qui poll la DB et execute yt-dlp
- `config/` : configuration centralisee (TTL, concurrence, chemins)
- `prisma/` : schema et migrations
- `docker-compose.yml` : MariaDB pour le developpement local
- Un seul `package.json` a la racine (contrainte o2switch/Passenger)
---
## Structure du projet
```
Ombrora-YTDLP/
├── src/
│ ├── app/
│ │ ├── page.tsx # Formulaire de soumission
│ │ ├── status/[uuid]/page.tsx # Page de statut
│ │ └── api/
│ │ ├── downloads/route.ts # POST soumission, GET statut
│ │ ├── downloads/[uuid]/route.ts
│ │ └── download/[token]/route.ts # Stream fichier via token
│ ├── components/
│ └── lib/
│ ├── prisma.ts
│ ├── rate-limit.ts
│ └── token.ts
├── worker/
│ ├── index.ts # Worker long-running principal
│ ├── cron-check.ts # Verifie que le worker tourne (cron 5 min)
│ └── cron-cleanup.ts # Supprime les fichiers expires (cron 1x/jour)
├── config/
│ └── app.config.ts
├── prisma/
│ └── schema.prisma
├── docker-compose.yml
└── package.json
```
---
## Schema base de donnees (Prisma / MariaDB)
```prisma
model Download {
id String @id @default(cuid())
uuid String @unique @default(uuid()) // expose sur les interfaces
url String
status Status @default(PENDING)
format String // ex: "mp4", "mp3"
quality String // ex: "best", "1080p"
subtitles Boolean @default(false)
extraArgs String? // options yt-dlp (JSON array de strings, ex: ["--sponsorblock-remove","all"])
filePath String? // chemin absolu sur disque
fileName String? // nom original
fileSize BigInt? // taille en octets
errorMsg String?
ipAddress String
submittedAt DateTime @default(now())
startedAt DateTime?
completedAt DateTime?
deletedAt DateTime?
tokens DownloadToken[]
}
model DownloadToken {
id String @id @default(cuid())
download Download @relation(fields: [downloadId], references: [id])
downloadId String
token String @unique @default(uuid())
expiresAt DateTime
usedAt DateTime?
createdAt DateTime @default(now())
}
enum Status {
PENDING // en attente de traitement
PROCESSING // worker en cours
DONE // fichier disponible
FAILED // echec yt-dlp
FILE_DELETED // metadonnees conservees, fichier supprime du disque
}
```
**Regles immuables :**
- Aucune entree n'est jamais supprimee de la DB (historique complet).
- `id` (cuid) usage interne uniquement ; `uuid` expose sur toutes les interfaces.
- Le fichier est stocke sous `{STORAGE_PATH}/{uuid}.{extension}`.
---
## Worker (worker/index.ts)
Processus Node.js long-running sous Passenger. Cycle a chaque iteration :
1. Requete DB : `SELECT` les `PENDING` ordonnes par `submittedAt`, limite a `WORKER_CONCURRENCY`.
2. Passe les entrees selectionnees en `PROCESSING` (atomique : UPDATE WHERE status=PENDING).
3. Spawne un `worker_thread` par telechargement.
4. Chaque thread construit la commande yt-dlp :
- `--no-playlist` toujours present
- `-f {format}` pour le format
- `--write-sub --sub-lang fr,en` si `subtitles=true`
- `-o {STORAGE_PATH}/{uuid}.%(ext)s` pour le chemin de sortie
- extraArgs injectes depuis le champ JSON
5. Fin du thread :
- **Succes** : `status=DONE`, remplit `filePath`, `fileName`, `fileSize`, `completedAt`, cree un `DownloadToken` avec `expiresAt = now + DOWNLOAD_LINK_TTL_HOURS`.
- **Echec** : `status=FAILED`, remplit `errorMsg` (stderr yt-dlp).
6. Attend `WORKER_POLL_INTERVAL_MS` puis recommence.
---
## Crons o2switch (cPanel)
| Script | Frequence | Role |
|--------|-----------|------|
| `worker/cron-check.ts` | Toutes les 5 min | Relance le worker s'il n'est pas actif |
| `worker/cron-cleanup.ts` | 1x par jour | Supprime les fichiers dont `completedAt + TTL < now`, passe `status=FILE_DELETED`, remplit `deletedAt` |
---
## API Routes (Next.js)
| Methode | Route | Description |
|---------|-------|-------------|
| `POST` | `/api/downloads` | Valide IP (rate limit), cree l'entree DB, retourne `{ uuid }` |
| `GET` | `/api/downloads/[uuid]` | Retourne statut et metadonnees du telechargement |
| `GET` | `/api/download/[token]` | Verifie token (existence, expiration), stream le fichier, marque `usedAt` |
**Rate limiting** (`lib/rate-limit.ts`) :
- Map en memoire : IP -> `{ count, resetAt }`
- Limite et fenetre configurables dans `app.config.ts`
- Pas de Redis requis
- Hypothese : Passenger tourne avec 1 seul processus Next.js sur o2switch (standard). Si plusieurs processus sont configures, la Map n'est pas partagee et le rate limit serait par-processus — a surveiller.
---
## Configuration (config/app.config.ts)
```typescript
export const config = {
DOWNLOAD_LINK_TTL_HOURS: 24, // duree de validite du lien temporaire
WORKER_CONCURRENCY: 3, // telechargements en parallele
WORKER_POLL_INTERVAL_MS: 10_000, // intervalle de poll de la DB
STORAGE_PATH: '/home/.../storage', // chemin absolu du dossier de stockage
RATE_LIMIT_MAX: 5, // soumissions max par IP
RATE_LIMIT_WINDOW_MS: 3_600_000, // fenetre de rate limit (1h)
}
```
---
## Frontend (React / Next.js)
### `/` — Formulaire de soumission
- Champ URL
- Select format (mp4, mp3, webm, ...)
- Select qualite (best, 1080p, 720p, 480p, ...)
- Checkbox sous-titres
- Champ options avancees (optionnel, libre)
- Soumission -> POST `/api/downloads` -> redirect vers `/status/{uuid}`
### `/status/[uuid]` — Page de statut
- Polling `GET /api/downloads/[uuid]` toutes les 5 secondes
- Affichage selon statut :
- `PENDING` / `PROCESSING` : indicateur de progression
- `DONE` : bouton de telechargement (lien `/api/download/{token}`)
- `FAILED` : message d'erreur yt-dlp
- `FILE_DELETED` : message "fichier expire, le telechargement n'est plus disponible"
---
## Contraintes de deploiement o2switch
- Un seul `package.json` / `node_modules` a la racine (pas de `frontend/node_modules`).
- Toute dependance runtime du frontend doit etre dans les `dependencies` de la racine ET dans `frontend/package.json` (si sous-dossier).
- yt-dlp doit etre installe comme binaire precompile (pas de build depuis les sources).
- Les dependances avec bindings natifs doivent publier des binaires precompiles pour la plateforme o2switch.
+7
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
/// <reference types="next" />
/// <reference types="next/image-types/global" />
import "./.next/dev/types/routes.d.ts";
import "./.next/dev/types/root-params.d.ts";
// NOTE: This file should not be edited
// see https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/config/typescript for more information.
+7784
View File
File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff
-1
View File
@@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
"keywords": [],
"author": "",
"license": "ISC",
"type": "commonjs",
"dependencies": {
"@prisma/adapter-mariadb": "^7.9.1",
"@prisma/client": "^7.9.1",
+8 -2
View File
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@
"strict": true,
"noEmit": true,
"esModuleInterop": true,
"module": "node16",
"moduleResolution": "node16",
"module": "esnext",
"moduleResolution": "bundler",
"resolveJsonModule": true,
"isolatedModules": true,
"jsx": "react-jsx",
@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@
}
]
},
"ts-node": {
"compilerOptions": {
"module": "commonjs",
"moduleResolution": "node"
}
},
"include": [
"next-env.d.ts",
"**/*.ts",
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long