fix for o2switch
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"hooks": {
|
||||
"PostToolUse": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"matcher": "Edit|Write|Bash",
|
||||
"hooks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "command",
|
||||
"command": "cat >/dev/null || true; git rev-parse --git-dir >/dev/null 2>&1 && code-review-graph update --skip-flows --repo \"C:/Users/tony1/PhpstormProjects/Convert\" || true",
|
||||
"timeout": 30
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"SessionStart": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"matcher": "",
|
||||
"hooks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "command",
|
||||
"command": "cat >/dev/null || true; git rev-parse --git-dir >/dev/null 2>&1 && code-review-graph status --repo \"C:/Users/tony1/PhpstormProjects/Convert\" || echo 'Not a git repo, skipping'",
|
||||
"timeout": 10
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"enabledPlugins": {
|
||||
"superpowers@claude-plugins-official": true,
|
||||
"claude-seo@agricidaniel-claude-seo": true,
|
||||
"ui-ux-pro-max@ui-ux-pro-max-skill": true
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: Debug Issue
|
||||
description: Systematically debug issues using graph-powered code navigation
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Debug Issue
|
||||
|
||||
Use the knowledge graph to systematically trace and debug issues.
|
||||
|
||||
### Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use `semantic_search_nodes` to find code related to the issue.
|
||||
2. Use `query_graph` with `callers_of` and `callees_of` to trace call chains.
|
||||
3. Use `get_flow` to see full execution paths through suspected areas.
|
||||
4. Run `detect_changes` to check if recent changes caused the issue.
|
||||
5. Use `get_impact_radius` on suspected files to see what else is affected.
|
||||
|
||||
### Tips
|
||||
|
||||
- Check both callers and callees to understand the full context.
|
||||
- Look at affected flows to find the entry point that triggers the bug.
|
||||
- Recent changes are the most common source of new issues.
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Efficiency Rules
|
||||
- ALWAYS start with `get_minimal_context(task="<your task>")` before any other graph tool.
|
||||
- Use `detail_level="minimal"` on all calls. Only escalate to "standard" when minimal is insufficient.
|
||||
- Target: complete any review/debug/refactor task in ≤5 tool calls and ≤800 total output tokens.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: Explore Codebase
|
||||
description: Navigate and understand codebase structure using the knowledge graph
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Explore Codebase
|
||||
|
||||
Use the code-review-graph MCP tools to explore and understand the codebase.
|
||||
|
||||
### Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run `list_graph_stats` to see overall codebase metrics.
|
||||
2. Run `get_architecture_overview` for high-level community structure.
|
||||
3. Use `list_communities` to find major modules, then `get_community` for details.
|
||||
4. Use `semantic_search_nodes` to find specific functions or classes.
|
||||
5. Use `query_graph` with patterns like `callers_of`, `callees_of`, `imports_of` to trace relationships.
|
||||
6. Use `list_flows` and `get_flow` to understand execution paths.
|
||||
|
||||
### Tips
|
||||
|
||||
- Start broad (stats, architecture) then narrow down to specific areas.
|
||||
- Use `children_of` on a file to see all its functions and classes.
|
||||
- Use `find_large_functions` to identify complex code.
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Efficiency Rules
|
||||
- ALWAYS start with `get_minimal_context(task="<your task>")` before any other graph tool.
|
||||
- Use `detail_level="minimal"` on all calls. Only escalate to "standard" when minimal is insufficient.
|
||||
- Target: complete any review/debug/refactor task in ≤5 tool calls and ≤800 total output tokens.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: Refactor Safely
|
||||
description: Plan and execute safe refactoring using dependency analysis
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Refactor Safely
|
||||
|
||||
Use the knowledge graph to plan and execute refactoring with confidence.
|
||||
|
||||
### Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use `refactor_tool` with mode="suggest" for community-driven refactoring suggestions.
|
||||
2. Use `refactor_tool` with mode="dead_code" to find unreferenced code.
|
||||
3. For renames, use `refactor_tool` with mode="rename" to preview all affected locations.
|
||||
4. Use `apply_refactor_tool` with the refactor_id to apply renames.
|
||||
5. After changes, run `detect_changes` to verify the refactoring impact.
|
||||
|
||||
### Safety Checks
|
||||
|
||||
- Always preview before applying (rename mode gives you an edit list).
|
||||
- Check `get_impact_radius` before major refactors.
|
||||
- Use `get_affected_flows` to ensure no critical paths are broken.
|
||||
- Run `find_large_functions` to identify decomposition targets.
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Efficiency Rules
|
||||
- ALWAYS start with `get_minimal_context(task="<your task>")` before any other graph tool.
|
||||
- Use `detail_level="minimal"` on all calls. Only escalate to "standard" when minimal is insufficient.
|
||||
- Target: complete any review/debug/refactor task in ≤5 tool calls and ≤800 total output tokens.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: Review Changes
|
||||
description: Perform a structured code review using change detection and impact
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Perform a thorough, risk-aware code review using the knowledge graph.
|
||||
|
||||
### Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run `detect_changes` to get risk-scored change analysis.
|
||||
2. Run `get_affected_flows` to find impacted execution paths.
|
||||
3. For each high-risk function, run `query_graph` with pattern="tests_for" to check test coverage.
|
||||
4. Run `get_impact_radius` to understand the blast radius.
|
||||
5. For any untested changes, suggest specific test cases.
|
||||
|
||||
### Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
Provide findings grouped by risk level (high/medium/low) with:
|
||||
- What changed and why it matters
|
||||
- Test coverage status
|
||||
- Suggested improvements
|
||||
- Overall merge recommendation
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Efficiency Rules
|
||||
- ALWAYS start with `get_minimal_context(task="<your task>")` before any other graph tool.
|
||||
- Use `detail_level="minimal"` on all calls. Only escalate to "standard" when minimal is insufficient.
|
||||
- Target: complete any review/debug/refactor task in ≤5 tool calls and ≤800 total output tokens.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
<!-- code-review-graph MCP tools -->
|
||||
## MCP Tools: code-review-graph
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPORTANT: This project has a knowledge graph. ALWAYS use the
|
||||
code-review-graph MCP tools BEFORE using Grep/Glob/Read to explore
|
||||
the codebase.** The graph is faster, cheaper (fewer tokens), and gives
|
||||
you structural context (callers, dependents, test coverage) that file
|
||||
scanning cannot.
|
||||
|
||||
### When to use graph tools FIRST
|
||||
|
||||
- **Exploring code**: `semantic_search_nodes` or `query_graph` instead of Grep
|
||||
- **Understanding impact**: `get_impact_radius` instead of manually tracing imports
|
||||
- **Code review**: `detect_changes` + `get_review_context` instead of reading entire files
|
||||
- **Finding relationships**: `query_graph` with callers_of/callees_of/imports_of/tests_for
|
||||
- **Architecture questions**: `get_architecture_overview` + `list_communities`
|
||||
|
||||
Fall back to Grep/Glob/Read **only** when the graph doesn't cover what you need.
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Tools
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Use when |
|
||||
| ------ | ---------- |
|
||||
| `detect_changes` | Reviewing code changes — gives risk-scored analysis |
|
||||
| `get_review_context` | Need source snippets for review — token-efficient |
|
||||
| `get_impact_radius` | Understanding blast radius of a change |
|
||||
| `get_affected_flows` | Finding which execution paths are impacted |
|
||||
| `query_graph` | Tracing callers, callees, imports, tests, dependencies |
|
||||
| `semantic_search_nodes` | Finding functions/classes by name or keyword |
|
||||
| `get_architecture_overview` | Understanding high-level codebase structure |
|
||||
| `refactor_tool` | Planning renames, finding dead code |
|
||||
|
||||
### Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
|
||||
2. Use `detect_changes` for code review.
|
||||
3. Use `get_affected_flows` to understand impact.
|
||||
4. Use `query_graph` pattern="tests_for" to check coverage.
|
||||
+12
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
PORT=3000
|
||||
STORAGE_DIR=./storage
|
||||
DB_HOST=127.0.0.1
|
||||
DB_USER=convert_user
|
||||
DB_PASSWORD=change_me
|
||||
DB_NAME=file_converter
|
||||
MAX_FILE_SIZE_MB=100
|
||||
RETENTION_HOURS=1
|
||||
WORKER_POLL_INTERVAL_MS=1500
|
||||
WORKER_CONCURRENCY=3
|
||||
RATE_LIMIT_MAX_JOBS=20
|
||||
RATE_LIMIT_WINDOW_MINUTES=10
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env bash
|
||||
# code-review-graph: session start status (Gemini CLI hook)
|
||||
# Must output ONLY JSON on stdout. Logs go to stderr. Never blocks the session.
|
||||
set -euo pipefail
|
||||
|
||||
cat > /dev/null || true
|
||||
|
||||
msg="$(code-review-graph status --repo "C:/Users/tony1/PhpstormProjects/Convert" 2>&1 | head -n 1 || true)"
|
||||
|
||||
CRG_MSG="$msg" python3 -c '
|
||||
import json,os
|
||||
m=os.environ.get("CRG_MSG","")
|
||||
print(json.dumps({"systemMessage":m,"suppressOutput":True}))
|
||||
' 2>/dev/null || echo '{"suppressOutput": true}'
|
||||
exit 0
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env bash
|
||||
# code-review-graph: incremental update after write/replace (Gemini CLI hook)
|
||||
# Must output ONLY JSON on stdout. Low-noise: no systemMessage.
|
||||
set -euo pipefail
|
||||
|
||||
cat > /dev/null || true
|
||||
|
||||
code-review-graph update --skip-flows --repo "C:/Users/tony1/PhpstormProjects/Convert" >/dev/null 2>&1 || true
|
||||
echo '{"suppressOutput": true}'
|
||||
exit 0
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"hooks": {
|
||||
"SessionStart": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"matcher": "",
|
||||
"hooks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "command",
|
||||
"command": "bash .gemini/hooks/crg-session-start.sh",
|
||||
"name": "code-review-graph status",
|
||||
"timeout": 10000
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"AfterTool": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"matcher": "write_file|replace",
|
||||
"hooks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "command",
|
||||
"command": "bash .gemini/hooks/crg-update.sh",
|
||||
"name": "code-review-graph update",
|
||||
"timeout": 30000
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: debug-issue
|
||||
description: Systematically debug issues using graph-powered code navigation
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Debug Issue
|
||||
|
||||
Use the knowledge graph to systematically trace and debug issues.
|
||||
|
||||
### Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use `semantic_search_nodes` to find code related to the issue.
|
||||
2. Use `query_graph` with `callers_of` and `callees_of` to trace call chains.
|
||||
3. Use `get_flow` to see full execution paths through suspected areas.
|
||||
4. Run `detect_changes` to check if recent changes caused the issue.
|
||||
5. Use `get_impact_radius` on suspected files to see what else is affected.
|
||||
|
||||
### Tips
|
||||
|
||||
- Check both callers and callees to understand the full context.
|
||||
- Look at affected flows to find the entry point that triggers the bug.
|
||||
- Recent changes are the most common source of new issues.
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Efficiency Rules
|
||||
- ALWAYS start with `get_minimal_context(task="<your task>")` before any other graph tool.
|
||||
- Use `detail_level="minimal"` on all calls. Only escalate to "standard" when minimal is insufficient.
|
||||
- Target: complete any review/debug/refactor task in ≤5 tool calls and ≤800 total output tokens.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: explore-codebase
|
||||
description: Navigate and understand codebase structure using the knowledge graph
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Explore Codebase
|
||||
|
||||
Use the code-review-graph MCP tools to explore and understand the codebase.
|
||||
|
||||
### Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run `list_graph_stats` to see overall codebase metrics.
|
||||
2. Run `get_architecture_overview` for high-level community structure.
|
||||
3. Use `list_communities` to find major modules, then `get_community` for details.
|
||||
4. Use `semantic_search_nodes` to find specific functions or classes.
|
||||
5. Use `query_graph` with patterns like `callers_of`, `callees_of`, `imports_of` to trace relationships.
|
||||
6. Use `list_flows` and `get_flow` to understand execution paths.
|
||||
|
||||
### Tips
|
||||
|
||||
- Start broad (stats, architecture) then narrow down to specific areas.
|
||||
- Use `children_of` on a file to see all its functions and classes.
|
||||
- Use `find_large_functions` to identify complex code.
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Efficiency Rules
|
||||
- ALWAYS start with `get_minimal_context(task="<your task>")` before any other graph tool.
|
||||
- Use `detail_level="minimal"` on all calls. Only escalate to "standard" when minimal is insufficient.
|
||||
- Target: complete any review/debug/refactor task in ≤5 tool calls and ≤800 total output tokens.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: refactor-safely
|
||||
description: Plan and execute safe refactoring using dependency analysis
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Refactor Safely
|
||||
|
||||
Use the knowledge graph to plan and execute refactoring with confidence.
|
||||
|
||||
### Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Use `refactor_tool` with mode="suggest" for community-driven refactoring suggestions.
|
||||
2. Use `refactor_tool` with mode="dead_code" to find unreferenced code.
|
||||
3. For renames, use `refactor_tool` with mode="rename" to preview all affected locations.
|
||||
4. Use `apply_refactor_tool` with the refactor_id to apply renames.
|
||||
5. After changes, run `detect_changes` to verify the refactoring impact.
|
||||
|
||||
### Safety Checks
|
||||
|
||||
- Always preview before applying (rename mode gives you an edit list).
|
||||
- Check `get_impact_radius` before major refactors.
|
||||
- Use `get_affected_flows` to ensure no critical paths are broken.
|
||||
- Run `find_large_functions` to identify decomposition targets.
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Efficiency Rules
|
||||
- ALWAYS start with `get_minimal_context(task="<your task>")` before any other graph tool.
|
||||
- Use `detail_level="minimal"` on all calls. Only escalate to "standard" when minimal is insufficient.
|
||||
- Target: complete any review/debug/refactor task in ≤5 tool calls and ≤800 total output tokens.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: review-changes
|
||||
description: Perform a structured code review using change detection and impact
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Changes
|
||||
|
||||
Perform a thorough, risk-aware code review using the knowledge graph.
|
||||
|
||||
### Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run `detect_changes` to get risk-scored change analysis.
|
||||
2. Run `get_affected_flows` to find impacted execution paths.
|
||||
3. For each high-risk function, run `query_graph` with pattern="tests_for" to check test coverage.
|
||||
4. Run `get_impact_radius` to understand the blast radius.
|
||||
5. For any untested changes, suggest specific test cases.
|
||||
|
||||
### Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
Provide findings grouped by risk level (high/medium/low) with:
|
||||
- What changed and why it matters
|
||||
- Test coverage status
|
||||
- Suggested improvements
|
||||
- Overall merge recommendation
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Efficiency Rules
|
||||
- ALWAYS start with `get_minimal_context(task="<your task>")` before any other graph tool.
|
||||
- Use `detail_level="minimal"` on all calls. Only escalate to "standard" when minimal is insufficient.
|
||||
- Target: complete any review/debug/refactor task in ≤5 tool calls and ≤800 total output tokens.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
applyTo: '**'
|
||||
description: >-
|
||||
Use code-review-graph MCP tools for token-efficient
|
||||
codebase exploration and code review.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- code-review-graph MCP tools -->
|
||||
## MCP Tools: code-review-graph
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPORTANT: This project has a knowledge graph. ALWAYS use the
|
||||
code-review-graph MCP tools BEFORE using file/search tools to
|
||||
explore the codebase.** The graph is faster, cheaper (fewer
|
||||
tokens), and gives you structural context (callers, dependents,
|
||||
test coverage) that file scanning cannot.
|
||||
|
||||
### When to use graph tools FIRST
|
||||
|
||||
- **Exploring code**: `semantic_search_nodes` or `query_graph`
|
||||
- **Understanding impact**: `get_impact_radius`
|
||||
- **Code review**: `detect_changes` + `get_review_context`
|
||||
- **Finding relationships**: `query_graph` callers_of/callees_of
|
||||
- **Architecture questions**: `get_architecture_overview`
|
||||
|
||||
Fall back to file/search tools **only** when the graph doesn't
|
||||
cover what you need.
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Tools
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Use when |
|
||||
| ------ | ---------- |
|
||||
| `detect_changes` | Risk-scored change analysis |
|
||||
| `get_review_context` | Token-efficient source snippets |
|
||||
| `get_impact_radius` | Blast radius of a change |
|
||||
| `get_affected_flows` | Impacted execution paths |
|
||||
| `query_graph` | Trace callers, callees, imports, tests |
|
||||
| `semantic_search_nodes` | Find functions/classes by keyword |
|
||||
| `get_architecture_overview` | High-level structure |
|
||||
| `refactor_tool` | Rename planning, dead code |
|
||||
|
||||
### Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
|
||||
2. Use `detect_changes` for code review.
|
||||
3. Use `get_affected_flows` to understand impact.
|
||||
4. Use `query_graph` pattern="tests_for" to check coverage.
|
||||
Generated
+10
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||
# Default ignored files
|
||||
/shelf/
|
||||
/workspace.xml
|
||||
# Editor-based HTTP Client requests
|
||||
/httpRequests/
|
||||
# Ignored default folder with query files
|
||||
/queries/
|
||||
# Datasource local storage ignored files
|
||||
/dataSources/
|
||||
/dataSources.local.xml
|
||||
Generated
+8
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<module type="WEB_MODULE" version="4">
|
||||
<component name="NewModuleRootManager">
|
||||
<content url="file://$MODULE_DIR$" />
|
||||
<orderEntry type="inheritedJdk" />
|
||||
<orderEntry type="sourceFolder" forTests="false" />
|
||||
</component>
|
||||
</module>
|
||||
Generated
+19
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<project version="4">
|
||||
<component name="PublishConfigData" autoUpload="Always" serverName="o2switch" createEmptyFolders="true" autoUploadExternalChanges="true" compareModeInSync="TIMESTAMP">
|
||||
<serverData>
|
||||
<paths name="o2switch">
|
||||
<serverdata>
|
||||
<mappings>
|
||||
<mapping deploy="/home/gaan6043/convert.ombrora.com-node" local="$PROJECT_DIR$" web="/" />
|
||||
</mappings>
|
||||
<excludedPaths>
|
||||
<excludedPath local="true" path="$PROJECT_DIR$/node_modules" />
|
||||
<excludedPath path="/home/gaan6043/convert.ombrora.com-node/node_modules" />
|
||||
</excludedPaths>
|
||||
</serverdata>
|
||||
</paths>
|
||||
</serverData>
|
||||
<option name="myAutoUpload" value="ALWAYS" />
|
||||
</component>
|
||||
</project>
|
||||
Generated
+10
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<project version="4">
|
||||
<component name="MaterialThemeProjectNewConfig">
|
||||
<option name="metadata">
|
||||
<MTProjectMetadataState>
|
||||
<option name="userId" value="-571dac5:19fa8904b57:-7ff2" />
|
||||
</MTProjectMetadataState>
|
||||
</option>
|
||||
</component>
|
||||
</project>
|
||||
Generated
+8
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<project version="4">
|
||||
<component name="ProjectModuleManager">
|
||||
<modules>
|
||||
<module fileurl="file://$PROJECT_DIR$/.idea/Convert.iml" filepath="$PROJECT_DIR$/.idea/Convert.iml" />
|
||||
</modules>
|
||||
</component>
|
||||
</project>
|
||||
Generated
+19
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<project version="4">
|
||||
<component name="MessDetectorOptionsConfiguration">
|
||||
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
|
||||
</component>
|
||||
<component name="PHPCSFixerOptionsConfiguration">
|
||||
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
|
||||
</component>
|
||||
<component name="PHPCodeSnifferOptionsConfiguration">
|
||||
<option name="highlightLevel" value="WARNING" />
|
||||
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
|
||||
</component>
|
||||
<component name="PhpStanOptionsConfiguration">
|
||||
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
|
||||
</component>
|
||||
<component name="PsalmOptionsConfiguration">
|
||||
<option name="transferred" value="true" />
|
||||
</component>
|
||||
</project>
|
||||
Generated
+8
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<project version="4">
|
||||
<component name="SshConfigs">
|
||||
<configs>
|
||||
<sshConfig host="argent.o2switch.net" id="15fd3db2-1f1b-4645-bfe5-a60189fe01b3" keyPath="$USER_HOME$/.ssh/id_rsa" port="22" nameFormat="DESCRIPTIVE" username="gaan6043" useOpenSSHConfig="true" />
|
||||
</configs>
|
||||
</component>
|
||||
</project>
|
||||
Generated
+6
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<project version="4">
|
||||
<component name="VcsDirectoryMappings">
|
||||
<mapping directory="$PROJECT_DIR$" vcs="Git" />
|
||||
</component>
|
||||
</project>
|
||||
Generated
+14
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
||||
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
|
||||
<project version="4">
|
||||
<component name="WebServers">
|
||||
<option name="servers">
|
||||
<webServer id="7c42815c-7c3e-429e-8ef0-7b8b4dc494ec" name="o2switch">
|
||||
<fileTransfer accessType="SFTP" host="argent.o2switch.net" port="22" sshConfigId="15fd3db2-1f1b-4645-bfe5-a60189fe01b3" sshConfig="gaan6043@argent.o2switch.net:22 key" keyPair="true">
|
||||
<advancedOptions>
|
||||
<advancedOptions dataProtectionLevel="Private" keepAliveTimeout="0" passiveMode="true" shareSSLContext="true" />
|
||||
</advancedOptions>
|
||||
</fileTransfer>
|
||||
</webServer>
|
||||
</option>
|
||||
</component>
|
||||
</project>
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
<!-- code-review-graph MCP tools -->
|
||||
## MCP Tools: code-review-graph
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPORTANT: This project has a knowledge graph. ALWAYS use the
|
||||
code-review-graph MCP tools BEFORE using Grep/Glob/Read to explore
|
||||
the codebase.** The graph is faster, cheaper (fewer tokens), and gives
|
||||
you structural context (callers, dependents, test coverage) that file
|
||||
scanning cannot.
|
||||
|
||||
### When to use graph tools FIRST
|
||||
|
||||
- **Exploring code**: `semantic_search_nodes` or `query_graph` instead of Grep
|
||||
- **Understanding impact**: `get_impact_radius` instead of manually tracing imports
|
||||
- **Code review**: `detect_changes` + `get_review_context` instead of reading entire files
|
||||
- **Finding relationships**: `query_graph` with callers_of/callees_of/imports_of/tests_for
|
||||
- **Architecture questions**: `get_architecture_overview` + `list_communities`
|
||||
|
||||
Fall back to Grep/Glob/Read **only** when the graph doesn't cover what you need.
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Tools
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Use when |
|
||||
| ------ | ---------- |
|
||||
| `detect_changes` | Reviewing code changes — gives risk-scored analysis |
|
||||
| `get_review_context` | Need source snippets for review — token-efficient |
|
||||
| `get_impact_radius` | Understanding blast radius of a change |
|
||||
| `get_affected_flows` | Finding which execution paths are impacted |
|
||||
| `query_graph` | Tracing callers, callees, imports, tests, dependencies |
|
||||
| `semantic_search_nodes` | Finding functions/classes by name or keyword |
|
||||
| `get_architecture_overview` | Understanding high-level codebase structure |
|
||||
| `refactor_tool` | Planning renames, finding dead code |
|
||||
|
||||
### Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
|
||||
2. Use `detect_changes` for code review.
|
||||
3. Use `get_affected_flows` to understand impact.
|
||||
4. Use `query_graph` pattern="tests_for" to check coverage.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"mcpServers": {
|
||||
"code-review-graph": {
|
||||
"command": "C:\\Users\\tony1\\AppData\\Local\\Python\\pythoncore-3.14-64\\python.exe",
|
||||
"args": [
|
||||
"-m",
|
||||
"code_review_graph",
|
||||
"serve"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"cwd": "C:\\Users\\tony1\\PhpstormProjects\\Convert",
|
||||
"type": "stdio"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"mcpServers": {
|
||||
"code-review-graph": {
|
||||
"command": "C:\\Users\\tony1\\AppData\\Local\\Python\\pythoncore-3.14-64\\python.exe",
|
||||
"args": [
|
||||
"-m",
|
||||
"code_review_graph",
|
||||
"serve"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"cwd": "C:\\Users\\tony1\\PhpstormProjects\\Convert",
|
||||
"type": "stdio",
|
||||
"env": []
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"mcpServers": {
|
||||
"code-review-graph": {
|
||||
"command": "C:\\Users\\tony1\\AppData\\Local\\Python\\pythoncore-3.14-64\\python.exe",
|
||||
"args": [
|
||||
"-m",
|
||||
"code_review_graph",
|
||||
"serve"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"cwd": "C:\\Users\\tony1\\PhpstormProjects\\Convert",
|
||||
"type": "stdio"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"hooks": {
|
||||
"PostToolUse": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"matcher": "Edit|Write|Bash",
|
||||
"hooks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "command",
|
||||
"command": "cat >/dev/null || true; git rev-parse --git-dir >/dev/null 2>&1 && code-review-graph update --skip-flows --repo \"C:/Users/tony1/PhpstormProjects/Convert\" || true",
|
||||
"timeout": 30
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"SessionStart": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"matcher": "",
|
||||
"hooks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "command",
|
||||
"command": "cat >/dev/null || true; git rev-parse --git-dir >/dev/null 2>&1 && code-review-graph status --repo \"C:/Users/tony1/PhpstormProjects/Convert\" || echo 'Not a git repo, skipping'",
|
||||
"timeout": 10
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
<!-- code-review-graph MCP tools -->
|
||||
## MCP Tools: code-review-graph
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPORTANT: This project has a knowledge graph. ALWAYS use the
|
||||
code-review-graph MCP tools BEFORE using Grep/Glob/Read to explore
|
||||
the codebase.** The graph is faster, cheaper (fewer tokens), and gives
|
||||
you structural context (callers, dependents, test coverage) that file
|
||||
scanning cannot.
|
||||
|
||||
### When to use graph tools FIRST
|
||||
|
||||
- **Exploring code**: `semantic_search_nodes` or `query_graph` instead of Grep
|
||||
- **Understanding impact**: `get_impact_radius` instead of manually tracing imports
|
||||
- **Code review**: `detect_changes` + `get_review_context` instead of reading entire files
|
||||
- **Finding relationships**: `query_graph` with callers_of/callees_of/imports_of/tests_for
|
||||
- **Architecture questions**: `get_architecture_overview` + `list_communities`
|
||||
|
||||
Fall back to Grep/Glob/Read **only** when the graph doesn't cover what you need.
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Tools
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Use when |
|
||||
| ------ | ---------- |
|
||||
| `detect_changes` | Reviewing code changes — gives risk-scored analysis |
|
||||
| `get_review_context` | Need source snippets for review — token-efficient |
|
||||
| `get_impact_radius` | Understanding blast radius of a change |
|
||||
| `get_affected_flows` | Finding which execution paths are impacted |
|
||||
| `query_graph` | Tracing callers, callees, imports, tests, dependencies |
|
||||
| `semantic_search_nodes` | Finding functions/classes by name or keyword |
|
||||
| `get_architecture_overview` | Understanding high-level codebase structure |
|
||||
| `refactor_tool` | Planning renames, finding dead code |
|
||||
|
||||
### Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
|
||||
2. Use `detect_changes` for code review.
|
||||
3. Use `get_affected_flows` to understand impact.
|
||||
4. Use `query_graph` pattern="tests_for" to check coverage.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
<!-- code-review-graph MCP tools -->
|
||||
## MCP Tools: code-review-graph
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPORTANT: This project has a knowledge graph. ALWAYS use the
|
||||
code-review-graph MCP tools BEFORE using Grep/Glob/Read to explore
|
||||
the codebase.** The graph is faster, cheaper (fewer tokens), and gives
|
||||
you structural context (callers, dependents, test coverage) that file
|
||||
scanning cannot.
|
||||
|
||||
### When to use graph tools FIRST
|
||||
|
||||
- **Exploring code**: `semantic_search_nodes` or `query_graph` instead of Grep
|
||||
- **Understanding impact**: `get_impact_radius` instead of manually tracing imports
|
||||
- **Code review**: `detect_changes` + `get_review_context` instead of reading entire files
|
||||
- **Finding relationships**: `query_graph` with callers_of/callees_of/imports_of/tests_for
|
||||
- **Architecture questions**: `get_architecture_overview` + `list_communities`
|
||||
|
||||
Fall back to Grep/Glob/Read **only** when the graph doesn't cover what you need.
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Tools
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Use when |
|
||||
| ------ | ---------- |
|
||||
| `detect_changes` | Reviewing code changes — gives risk-scored analysis |
|
||||
| `get_review_context` | Need source snippets for review — token-efficient |
|
||||
| `get_impact_radius` | Understanding blast radius of a change |
|
||||
| `get_affected_flows` | Finding which execution paths are impacted |
|
||||
| `query_graph` | Tracing callers, callees, imports, tests, dependencies |
|
||||
| `semantic_search_nodes` | Finding functions/classes by name or keyword |
|
||||
| `get_architecture_overview` | Understanding high-level codebase structure |
|
||||
| `refactor_tool` | Planning renames, finding dead code |
|
||||
|
||||
### Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
|
||||
2. Use `detect_changes` for code review.
|
||||
3. Use `get_affected_flows` to understand impact.
|
||||
4. Use `query_graph` pattern="tests_for" to check coverage.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||
## Approach
|
||||
- Read existing files before writing. Don't re-read unless changed.
|
||||
- Thorough in reasoning, concise in output.
|
||||
- Skip files over 100KB unless required.
|
||||
- No sycophantic openers or closing fluff.
|
||||
- No emojis or em-dashes.
|
||||
- Do not guess APIs, versions, flags, commit SHAs, or package names. Verify by reading code or docs before asserting.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- code-review-graph MCP tools -->
|
||||
## MCP Tools: code-review-graph
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPORTANT: This project has a knowledge graph. ALWAYS use the
|
||||
code-review-graph MCP tools BEFORE using Grep/Glob/Read to explore
|
||||
the codebase.** The graph is faster, cheaper (fewer tokens), and gives
|
||||
you structural context (callers, dependents, test coverage) that file
|
||||
scanning cannot.
|
||||
|
||||
### When to use graph tools FIRST
|
||||
|
||||
- **Exploring code**: `semantic_search_nodes` or `query_graph` instead of Grep
|
||||
- **Understanding impact**: `get_impact_radius` instead of manually tracing imports
|
||||
- **Code review**: `detect_changes` + `get_review_context` instead of reading entire files
|
||||
- **Finding relationships**: `query_graph` with callers_of/callees_of/imports_of/tests_for
|
||||
- **Architecture questions**: `get_architecture_overview` + `list_communities`
|
||||
|
||||
Fall back to Grep/Glob/Read **only** when the graph doesn't cover what you need.
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Tools
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Use when |
|
||||
| ------ | ---------- |
|
||||
| `detect_changes` | Reviewing code changes — gives risk-scored analysis |
|
||||
| `get_review_context` | Need source snippets for review — token-efficient |
|
||||
| `get_impact_radius` | Understanding blast radius of a change |
|
||||
| `get_affected_flows` | Finding which execution paths are impacted |
|
||||
| `query_graph` | Tracing callers, callees, imports, tests, dependencies |
|
||||
| `semantic_search_nodes` | Finding functions/classes by name or keyword |
|
||||
| `get_architecture_overview` | Understanding high-level codebase structure |
|
||||
| `refactor_tool` | Planning renames, finding dead code |
|
||||
|
||||
### Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
|
||||
2. Use `detect_changes` for code review.
|
||||
3. Use `get_affected_flows` to understand impact.
|
||||
4. Use `query_graph` pattern="tests_for" to check coverage.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
<!-- code-review-graph MCP tools -->
|
||||
## MCP Tools: code-review-graph
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPORTANT: This project has a knowledge graph. ALWAYS use the
|
||||
code-review-graph MCP tools BEFORE using Grep/Glob/Read to explore
|
||||
the codebase.** The graph is faster, cheaper (fewer tokens), and gives
|
||||
you structural context (callers, dependents, test coverage) that file
|
||||
scanning cannot.
|
||||
|
||||
### When to use graph tools FIRST
|
||||
|
||||
- **Exploring code**: `semantic_search_nodes` or `query_graph` instead of Grep
|
||||
- **Understanding impact**: `get_impact_radius` instead of manually tracing imports
|
||||
- **Code review**: `detect_changes` + `get_review_context` instead of reading entire files
|
||||
- **Finding relationships**: `query_graph` with callers_of/callees_of/imports_of/tests_for
|
||||
- **Architecture questions**: `get_architecture_overview` + `list_communities`
|
||||
|
||||
Fall back to Grep/Glob/Read **only** when the graph doesn't cover what you need.
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Tools
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Use when |
|
||||
| ------ | ---------- |
|
||||
| `detect_changes` | Reviewing code changes — gives risk-scored analysis |
|
||||
| `get_review_context` | Need source snippets for review — token-efficient |
|
||||
| `get_impact_radius` | Understanding blast radius of a change |
|
||||
| `get_affected_flows` | Finding which execution paths are impacted |
|
||||
| `query_graph` | Tracing callers, callees, imports, tests, dependencies |
|
||||
| `semantic_search_nodes` | Finding functions/classes by name or keyword |
|
||||
| `get_architecture_overview` | Understanding high-level codebase structure |
|
||||
| `refactor_tool` | Planning renames, finding dead code |
|
||||
|
||||
### Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
|
||||
2. Use `detect_changes` for code review.
|
||||
3. Use `get_affected_flows` to understand impact.
|
||||
4. Use `query_graph` pattern="tests_for" to check coverage.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
<!-- code-review-graph MCP tools -->
|
||||
## MCP Tools: code-review-graph
|
||||
|
||||
**IMPORTANT: This project has a knowledge graph. ALWAYS use the
|
||||
code-review-graph MCP tools BEFORE using Grep/Glob/Read to explore
|
||||
the codebase.** The graph is faster, cheaper (fewer tokens), and gives
|
||||
you structural context (callers, dependents, test coverage) that file
|
||||
scanning cannot.
|
||||
|
||||
### When to use graph tools FIRST
|
||||
|
||||
- **Exploring code**: `semantic_search_nodes` or `query_graph` instead of Grep
|
||||
- **Understanding impact**: `get_impact_radius` instead of manually tracing imports
|
||||
- **Code review**: `detect_changes` + `get_review_context` instead of reading entire files
|
||||
- **Finding relationships**: `query_graph` with callers_of/callees_of/imports_of/tests_for
|
||||
- **Architecture questions**: `get_architecture_overview` + `list_communities`
|
||||
|
||||
Fall back to Grep/Glob/Read **only** when the graph doesn't cover what you need.
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Tools
|
||||
|
||||
| Tool | Use when |
|
||||
| ------ | ---------- |
|
||||
| `detect_changes` | Reviewing code changes — gives risk-scored analysis |
|
||||
| `get_review_context` | Need source snippets for review — token-efficient |
|
||||
| `get_impact_radius` | Understanding blast radius of a change |
|
||||
| `get_affected_flows` | Finding which execution paths are impacted |
|
||||
| `query_graph` | Tracing callers, callees, imports, tests, dependencies |
|
||||
| `semantic_search_nodes` | Finding functions/classes by name or keyword |
|
||||
| `get_architecture_overview` | Understanding high-level codebase structure |
|
||||
| `refactor_tool` | Planning renames, finding dead code |
|
||||
|
||||
### Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. The graph auto-updates on file changes (via hooks).
|
||||
2. Use `detect_changes` for code review.
|
||||
3. Use `get_affected_flows` to understand impact.
|
||||
4. Use `query_graph` pattern="tests_for" to check coverage.
|
||||
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
|
||||
3. Apply `db/schema.sql` to the MariaDB database created in cPanel.
|
||||
4. `npm install` (never with `--ignore-scripts` — Puppeteer needs its postinstall step to download Chromium).
|
||||
5. Configure the app in cPanel "Setup Node.js App", pointing its entry point at `src/server.js`. Passenger manages this process (start/stop/restart).
|
||||
6. Start the worker independently of Passenger, over SSH: `pm2 start ecosystem.config.cjs`, then `pm2 save`. Try `pm2 startup` to survive a server reboot; if that's not permitted without root on this account, fall back to a cPanel cron job every 5 minutes that runs `pm2 resurrect` (or checks `pm2 list` and restarts the app if absent) — validate which option this hosting plan actually allows once connected over SSH.
|
||||
6. Start the worker independently of Passenger, over SSH: `./node_modules/.bin/pm2 start ecosystem.config.cjs`, then `pm2 save`. Try `pm2 startup` to survive a server reboot; if that's not permitted without root on this account, fall back to a cPanel cron job every 5 minutes that runs `pm2 resurrect` (or checks `pm2 list` and restarts the app if absent) — validate which option this hosting plan actually allows once connected over SSH.
|
||||
7. Add a cPanel cron job to run the cleanup script periodically, e.g. every 15 minutes:
|
||||
`*/15 * * * * cd /home/<cpanel-user>/<app-path> && /usr/bin/node src/cleanup.js >> logs/cleanup.log 2>&1`
|
||||
(adjust the path and node binary location to match your actual account — check with `which node` over SSH).
|
||||
|
||||
Generated
+899
-1
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
|
||||
"multer": "^2.2.0",
|
||||
"pdf-lib": "^1.17.1",
|
||||
"pdfjs-dist": "^6.2.108",
|
||||
"pm2": "^7.0.3",
|
||||
"puppeteer": "^25.4.0",
|
||||
"sharp": "^0.35.3",
|
||||
"uuid": "^14.0.1"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ export function createApp(config, pool) {
|
||||
registerAllConverters();
|
||||
|
||||
const app = express();
|
||||
app.set('trust proxy', '1');
|
||||
|
||||
const storage = multer.diskStorage({
|
||||
destination: (req, file, cb) => cb(null, path.join(config.storageDir, 'uploads')),
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user